835 Denial Combination
CO-29
Contractual Obligation · Claim-Level Adjustment
Timely FilingWhat This Combination Means
This claim was denied because it was submitted after the payer's contractual timely filing deadline. The provider is contractually obligated to write off the entire denied amount and cannot balance bill the patient, even though the denial resulted from a provider-side filing error.
Financial Responsibility
provider writeoff
The provider must absorb the full cost of services rendered. Contractual terms prevent patient billing for late-filed claims, regardless of patient benefit eligibility.
N/A
Appeal Success
30-60 days (appeal process)
Avg. Resolution
Hard
Difficulty
No
Appealable
Step-by-Step Resolution
Steps tailored specifically to this CO-29 combination — not generic advice.
- 1
Verify actual date of service and claim submission date in your practice management system
Confirm whether the claim truly exceeded the contractual filing limit specified in your payer contract
- 2
Determine if qualifying extenuating circumstances exist for late filing
Valid reasons include payer system outages, retroactive eligibility changes, delayed coordination of benefits information, or documented prior payer correspondence causing delays
- 3
Submit a timely filing appeal with documented evidence of extenuating circumstances within the payer's appeal timeframe
Include proof of timely intent (transmission reports, prior correspondence) or evidence that filing delay was beyond provider control
- 4
If appeal is denied, write off the balance and update billing procedures to prevent future timely filing violations
Patient cannot be billed per contractual obligation; implement claim scrubbing and aging reports to catch filing deadline risks earlier
Specialty Context
How CO-29 typically presents across different practice types.
Dental
Verify timely filing limits in dental contracts, which often range from 90 days to 1 year from date of service; orthodontic claims with multiple service dates require careful tracking
Medical
Hospital claims may have different timely filing limits than professional claims; coordinate benefits situations and retroactive eligibility changes are common appeal justifications
Behavioral Health
Ongoing treatment episodes and authorization delays can complicate timely filing; document all communications regarding authorization or eligibility verification that may have caused submission delays
Individual Code References
View the standalone definition for each code in this combination.
Medicare Contractor Guidance for CARC 29
Noridian + uhc + aetna + bcbs_azThe time limit for filing has expired. Claims must be filed within one year of the date of service. If an act of nature, such as a flood, fire, or there are other circumstances outside of the supplier's control, you can appeal the timely filing, by providing this explanation.
How to Prevent CARC 29 Denials
- ✓
Review the date of service prior to submitting the claim. All claims must be filed within one year of the date of service.
- ✓
Reopenings must be submitted one year from initial determination date or after one year from receipt date due to overpayment via clerical error omissions
Need to resolve this denial?
Get a complete resolution plan with appeal guidance for this exact combination in seconds.
Generate a free resolution plan & appeal letter →Synthesized from official definitions — not from training data